Saturday, May 4, 2013

Bigoted Wisconsin Family Action takes aim at Paul Ryan, and other peoples First Amendment Rights.

How can one group make marriage sound so horrible?

When Paul Ryan came out for gay adoption the other day, you could just hear the Old Testament profanities streaming out of the offices of Wisconsin Family Action. And like their name suggests, these idolaters sprang into…action.

Thinking they had some legitimate point to make, this groups self-righteous purveyor of God’s word and president Julaine Appling, fired off a list of intimidating finger wagging questions for Ryan to answer. Sadly, responding to this hate group would only legitimize their embarrassing existence. Here’s the big “push” question to Ryan that certainly makes their biased point:
“Whether his own family experience and the overwhelming body of research on this subject is what he believes or if he has fallen prey to political pressure and ‘political correctness.’”
Appling is of course promoting her own extremist version of political correctness, which she would happily force on every American by writing it into the Constitution. Here's WKOW's coverage:



Appling's own repressed feelings may also be a source of her strength. What else could drive her bigoted, subservient and unconstitutional agenda to the wall. Wisconsin Family Action would do away with privacy, and force their religious dogma onto everyone else. Her audience of low information cultists loves the message.

I put together a group of audio clips proving my point, from their own "Family Minute" comments. Remember the 8th grade crossword puzzle that said conservatism "restricts personal freedom?" Appling went nuts, but then proved the crossword puzzles point with her morally restrictive doctrine.


Personhood for a fertilized egg? Sure. But offer lifesaving health care for that “person” once they take their first breath (the actual "personhood" standard set by God in Genesis), forget it.
  
Appling and her doctrine of conservative authoritarianism has battered the institution of marriage, making it into something suffocating and misogynistic. 

No comments:

Post a Comment