Sunday, April 30, 2023

4 Job Searches a Week angering/costing Businesses money, causing applicant Ghosting of interviews.

Compare the two following responses, Democratic vs Republican. The contrast is so dramatic, that I had to feature it here. 

Deceptive Work Requirement Referendum: No surprise...

Wisconsin voters supported in an advisory referendum a work requirement for recipients of taxpayer-funded benefits.
But Republicans want you to think it has something to do with cuts to unemployment benefits. Unemployment is an insurance program that's set up just like SS and Medicare, paid for by hard working employees and employers. It is NOT a taxpayer-funded "welfare" program. So, it's not part of the referendum.

Point:  GOP Punishment...4 Job Searches a Week = Ghosting: That's the case I'm making here. State Rep. Jerry O'Connor (R) highlights the problem below, oblivious to the job search requirement that made "ghosting" a huge problem. Having been a blue-collar worker myself, I've been on unemployment a bunch of times, and you will eventually run out of places for your skill set. Sure, employers are angry about the cost of setting up interviews that never happen, but that's a newer GOP created problem


Counter Point: While Rep. O'Connor struggles to identify a failed GOP job search requirement, Democratic Rep. Katrina Shankland points out how this is really an attack on workers, ignoring what unemployment insurance was designed to do. The difference in actual governing is shocking: 
Shankland: "This is an insurance program you earned, because you worked...what my colleagues across the aisle intended to do with this legislation is one missed interview, one car breaking down, one losing your childcare slot for the day or week, and you would lose unemployment for that week as well."
Bottom line? Republican would rather punish workers than have to deal with the complexities of the insurance program itself. Oh, and more importantly, Republican want to lower the cost to employers for the insurance program. See how they did it below the video...


 
From February 2016: Here's how Republicans help businesses, but then screws and punishes workers...and taxpayers:

The Dirty Little Funding Secret: Republicans and employers hate putting money into the state's unemployment fund so much that they conceived the scam below. This is corporate welfare on steroids, from a posted I wrote July 11, 2013:
jsonline: Under changes to the state's unemployment insurance system adopted by the Legislature's budget committee Wednesday, taxpayers would spend $26 million over two years to prop up the unemployment fund, To avoid having employers face new assessments this year, the committee voted to use $26 million in general tax dollars to pay down interest on that loan.
Think that’s bad? Taxpayers will be used to scam the federal government. Republican will borrow our hard-earned taxpayer dollars to shore up the unemployment fund, so the fed won’t raise taxes on EMPLOYERS, the ones who actually fund the account.
Additionally, the committee proposal would allow the state Department of Administration to lend up to $50 million in taxpayer money to the unemployment insurance fund. That loan would help the state ensure that the unemployment fund has a positive balance in 2014, which in turn would keep the federal government from raising taxes on employers by $191 million in 2015.
Instead of employers taking responsibility for funding their own insurance program, Walker Republicans have shifted that liability over to taxpayers. All is well in "Stand with Walker" land.

WI Republicans reject tech economy, increasing teacher workforce, mental health programs again, and medications in schools that reverse opioid overdoses.

For WI MAGA Republicans, the massive budget surplus (partly due to letting the state's infrastructure and social programs go to hell) means that it's time for more tax cuts, especially for the victimized wealthy in those higher brackets. GOP leaders are now openly saying that the unfair higher tax brackets must be reduced with a flat tax. But...

...the state’s average income tax rates are more favorable to high- and middle-income residents and worse for those with lower incomes, the Wisconsin Policy Forum reported last year.

Conservative voters should be embarrassed by what was cut from Gov. Evers budget, but they aren't.

WISGOP Values? None: Here's the breathtaking list of rejected budget items Vos Republicans found a little too "woke." Milwaukee Journal Sentinel

1. They didn't really mean it...Rejected up to three months of a paid leave of absence for family and medical reasons. Anti-abortion lobbying groups initially showed support after overturning Roe v. Wade, and Republican challengers to Evers embraced the idea as well. Never mind.

2. Forget about preventing gun violence...Cut Evers’ mental health initiatives, including funding for mental health staff and suicide prevention programs.

3. Teacher shortage? What shortage...Cut Evers’ proposals for building the state’s teaching workforce, including stipends for student teachers and “grown your own” programs that help school staff earn higher degrees.

4. Once a must have by Republicans...Cut funding for financial literacy.

5. Too 21st Century? Worst way to attract or keep young job seekers? Cut funding for computer science and math programs. 

6. Are you sitting down for this mindblower? They cut a requirement for schools to carry naloxone or other medication that can reverse opioid overdoses.

7. Maintaining that Dragnet's Joe Friday was right, rejected...Evers proposed legalizing marijuana for users 21 and older. Legalization is estimated to generate $166 million in revenue that Evers has said he wants to use to help fund schools. Wisconsin is in the minority of states that haven't legalized marijuana use in some form.

8. Too easy?...Wisconsin drivers would have been automatically registered to vote under another of Evers’ proposals.

9. While spending taxpayer money supplying communities with bottle water and testing, can we ever have too much of a cancer-causing chemical in our drinking water? Eliminated were the proposals for PFAS standards.

10. Because hiding a dumb and unpopular decision is safer, Republicans...Eliminated a provision in Evers’ budget that would have put an end to anonymous objections to stewardship program proposals by the Joint Finance Committee, requiring the release of a legislator's name.

Monday, April 24, 2023

No, really, this is what real women do...they buy a Real Women of Politics Koozie.

Okay, I can't pass up this real, not kidding, Gov. Sanders jaw dropping ad finally defining what real women do...