I posted a story on dirt roads awhile back. Gov. Walker's push to bring back dirt roads is an odd bragging point, ya think? The Republican legislature decided to kick the can down the dirt road in the last budget, preferring to take general fund cash and charging the rest. That story from Rock County still gets a lot
of hits today.
Well, here’s another one, from the Tomah Journal:
Monroe County has two options for its highway systems —either reinvest in the system or let the county highways turn back into dirt roads — according to highway commissioner Jack Dittmar. The Wisconsin Information System for Local Roads, a program through the Wisconsin Department of Transportation, supports Dittmar's argument. The program says Monroe County's highways require millions of dollars in repairs.
Let’s hear what a Republican thinks of this mounting problem, and his well thought out solution:
Supervisor James Kuhn wasn't convinced that moving toward dirt county roads would be a bad thing. "Dirt roads are nothing new. They work," said Kuhn.
You would think something deep inside this guy would tell him that's not right, something’s really not good about that option. The reason's for the funding shortfall may require solutions our pledge taking Republicans would never support:
The highway system is in dire condition after 15 years of rising construction costs without a corresponding rise in revenues for the department.Here’s Rachel Maddow with another back to dirt roads story.
"For us, the real key ingredient is asphalt," Dittmar said. Asphalt has gone from $25 per ton to $60 per ton since 1999.
"Our revenues has been pretty much stagnant," Dittmar said. Although the total county tax levy has doubled in the past 15 years, highway tax levy has been roughly $2 million per year since 2000.
"We can't do any more with less. We've been doing that for too long," Dittmar said.
I just traveled on some of the state highways in Pennsylvania and Ohio. As I drove down these highways, and observed the lives of the rural poor who lived on them, I thought it would be a very good idea for the governors to be required to make the same trip, and to stop and talk to their constituents. Ditto with the "back to the gravel" talk you mention here. The lives of the state's citizens are greatly affected by decisions made at the state level, yet the governors (and state legislators, for that matter) have little knowledge of the impact of their decision. The tea party Republican governors in particular should be forced to see and hear about the impact of those decisions from the people whose lives have changed. Traveling the gravel roads (on a Harley, don'tcha know) would be a good way for our favorite TP gov to learn some reality.
ReplyDelete