Paul Ryan knows how to spin BS, like his workaround argument
regarding the number of Obama’s “executive orders.”
According to Ryan, it’s not how many orders, because Republicans lost that lie to the facts, but the “scope” of his executive orders. And that means…?
According to Ryan, it’s not how many orders, because Republicans lost that lie to the facts, but the “scope” of his executive orders. And that means…?
One important fact: The Affordable Care Act allows for
flexibility and delays to the mandates as problems come up. Below, Ryan feeds
off the tea party frenzy over ObamaCare.
Think about it, this guy who could have been our vice president
is calling Obama's term, a “Lawless presidency.” That's not true, unless we’re
getting rid of presumed innocence? I wouldn't put it past him.
jsonline: Rep. Paul Ryan said Sunday that President Barack Obama is running an "increasingly lawless presidency" by circumventing Congress. Host George Stephanopoulos suggested to Ryan that Obama's rate of using executive orders was far behind Presidents Reagan, Bush and Clinton.
It’s the “scope” and “new laws?” Ryan then admits
it’s just a difference of opinion:
Said Ryan: "It's not the number of executive orders, it's the scope of the executive orders. It's the fact that he is actually contradicting law like in the health care case, or proposing new laws without going through congress, George, that's the issue."
Stephanopoulos asked Ryan if he planned to try to impeach Obama. Said Ryan: "No, I'm not — look, what we — we have a difference of opinion, clearly, and — and some of these are going to get fought out in court. And I think these executive orders are creating a dangerous trend which is contrary to the Constitution."
Like the dangerous trend from all the past presidents? Ryan has lost it.
No comments:
Post a Comment