Since a majority of Wisconsinites don’t have a desire to carry a weapon, and prior to legalization a huge majority of people were against concealed carry.
jsonline: Gun-rights activist Krysta Sutterfield was charged Tuesday with carrying a concealed weapon for wearing a holstered gun under her jacket … Sutterfield also is fighting two municipal tickets stemming from the same incident: one for loitering or prowling and another for obstructing an officer, according to Coffee.
The officers asked Sutterfield if she had a concealed-weapons permit. "The defendant did not answer, but rather stated that she was not carrying a concealed weapon," the complaint says … The officers seized the Glock 17 loaded with 18 live rounds of hollowpoint ammunition, including one in the chamber. Police located two more guns and more ammunition in the trunk of the car.
This isn't the first time … Last year, she openly wore a holstered gun to a Brookfield church service and was later arrested. Her lawsuit against the city for false arrest was settled for $7,500.
Earlier this year, Milwaukee police seized a gun from Sutterfield after her therapist reported she had talked about suicide. Milwaukee County Circuit Judge Rebecca Dallet ordered the gun returned to Sutterfield after a national gun rights attorney took up the case. The attorney argued that the police had violated proper court procedures by revealing confidential medical information about her without notifying her first.
Everyone I know who supported concealed carry, carried anyway. It was illegal. What I’ve noticed about conservatives and laws; they break laws they disagree with. It’s a self-righteous position to take, and a reason history or facts never get in the way of their agenda.
Want the latest concealed carry lawbreaker news? There's not a lot of information out there due to state laws restricting access to license holders information, but what is available can be found at the Violence Policy Center.
KEEP BRIBE TAKING, CASE FIXING, CORRUPT JUDGE DALLET OFF THE SUPREME COURT SHE SHOULD ONLY BE ALLOWED TO SCRUB TERLETS AND URINALS IN THE COURTHOUSE. SHE IS THE MOST CORRUPT AND APPEALED JUDGE IN WISCONSIN, EVER! ONE HUNDRED AND EIGHT (108) APPEALS CURRENTLY PENDING - MAKE SURE SHE ANSWERS FOR ALL THOSE JUDICIAL DECISIONS. SHE WANTS TO RUN AWAY AND HIDE FROM THOSE RULINGS, AS THE BRIBE CHECKS ALREADY CLEARED. THIS IS REASON ENOUGH TO KEEP HER OFF THE SUPREME COURT. RESEARCH HER RECORD , SEE HOW HORRIBLE HER RECORD IS REGARDING FAIR TREATMENT OF THE POOR OR PRO SE LITIGANTS. IF YOU ARE POOR, DO NOT EXPECT ANY FAIR TREATMENT IN DALLET'S COURTROOM. SHE BULLIES AND BERATES THE POOR IN HER COURTROOM. SHE REMOVED A SEVERELY DEVELOPMENTALLY DISABLED / PARTIALLY BLIND MAN'S MOTHER, WHO HE BROUGHT TO READ FOR HIM. THE CASE WAS ABOUT BEING DEFRAUDED OUT OF HIS EDUCATION GRANT. THE RESPONDENT GOT FREE REPRESENTATION BY THE ATTORNEY GENERAL; BIT HIS CASE WAS SO STRONG, DALLET HAD TO PREVENT HIM FROM ENTERING ANY TESTIMONY.ReplyDelete
SHE LIED ABOUT THESE FACTS in her ruling:
"the Court having considered the parties' written submissions and oral arguments, it is HEREBY ORDERED:
For the reasons stated on the record, the motions to dismiss are granted."
the bribe check cleared.
THEN, after a rehearing petition was filed, Dallet told more lies and admitted she cheated the brain damaged litigant with these statements:
"The Court was never told by Mr. Wilke that he needed any accommodation nor was the court advised as to why Mr. Wilke's mother was coming up to plaintiff's table.Unfortunately, the Court could not rear any statement on the merits as the mandatory service requirements were not met by Mr. Wilke."
Mr. Wilke - ME. I filed a request witH her court clerk, AND, filed a disabled affidavit. So - she is a lying, cheating, case fixing, bag of shit.
Keep her corrupt stinky cunt off the Supreme court bench - by all means!
Even tough a disability affidavit was filed, detailing the complainant's cognitive and visual issues
HOWEVER, She finally tells the truth in that same letter when she states:
"Because the Court has no competency to hear this case, the Petition for Rehearing is denied."
She ran out of lies, so she admits to being INCOMPETENT!!!!
THAT IS CORRECT: AN ADMITTEDLY INCOMPETENT JUDGE wants a seat on the highest court in the state.
WTF? Why Theses Frauds?
SHE MUST BE REALLY GOOD AT ORALLY PERSUADING SOMEBODY
answer - Research her record - SHE IS AN UNFUNNY JUDICIAL CLOWN.
WATCH YOUR WALLET - IGNORE HER ON THE BALLOT
CORRUPTION BY THE PALLET - JUSTICE: INCARCERATE LYING DALLET
BECAUSE BLOWING THE COCKSURE FOR BRIBES IS NOT A JUDICIAL TALENT.
SHE SHOULD BE IN JAIL FOR OBSTRUCTING JUSTICE, FIXING CASES, AND PERJURY. BUT THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OWES HER LOTS OF FAVORS. SO THEY FIX CASES FOR EACH OTHER - TOO BAD FOR THE POOR, OR HONEST PEOPLE. IF ANY STATEMENTS WERE UNTRUE, THE FBI WOULD COME AFTER ME. THIS IS THE ONLY FORUM (THE INTERNET) THE STATE GIVES ME, AS THEY ARE ALSO BRIBE TAKING, CORRUPT, COVER UP SCUM. I WILL POST UNTIL LONG AFTER SHE LOSES THE ELECTION,
BECAUSE SHE IS A CORRUPT JUDGE / WITH NO SHAME OR DECENCY.
REMOVED FROM CRIMINAL COURT FOR MISTREATING LITIGANTS?ReplyDelete
VOTED "EXTREMELY HARSH" BY HER PEERS?
ONE HUNDRED & EIGHT, (108) current appeals pending?
HOW DID SHE EVEN GET THIS FAR?
A POTENTIAL SEAT ON THE BENCH OF SUPREME COURT?
YOU ARE JOKING? RIGHT?
COME ON WISCONSIN LAW JOURNAL; EXPOSE THE INCOMPETENT CLOWN
No honor Dallet:ReplyDelete
You cheated me, then you and your court reporter told multiple lies to cover it up. You both are an embarrassment. Then you have the nerve to state:
“Our courts and our election system need to be held to the highest standard of independence,” said Judge Dallet. “We need a strong recusal rule, and we need judges who will ensure that bias is removed from the courtroom. It’s time for the era of special interest influence to end.”
In order to try and hold, “Our courts to that highest standard”, and, “It’s time for the era of special interest influence”, that being: the Attorney General. The respondents Lawyer, the Attorney General, a not-see judge against, VS: a brain damaged complainant, his solid discrimination / abuse / fraud case, and his eighty-three year old Mother, there to read for him. It is now clear why you removed my Mother.
After being in your court room, and watching you remove my 83 year old Mother, for no other reason than to be a bully to her and confuse me, then prove to me that you have zero respect for the many discriminatory challenges he disabled face evert day. Despite your personal beliefs, they do have rights. It is not an accommodation to provide more discrimination in the circuit court. It should be a place where equal justice exists for all. Not just those who put checks in your pocket.
I feel it is my duty as a citizen to do everything that the law allows, so as to ensure you never get a chances to use a government position to bully anyone; especially those who historically have had difficulties getting any access to the court system.
The U.S. Constitution guarantees me due process and fair trial.
You used your position to nullify these rights.
Now I must use the Truth to nullify your opportunities to cheat anybody else.
I WILL NEVER BREAK ANY LAW IN DOING SO.
You collected a check for cheated an almost blind, severely brain / cognitively damaged man.
My civic duty is to make sure that you never defraud anyone else ever, ever again. The respondent in my case was an animal abuser who has state goons in her pocket to cover up her crimes. As she cheated me out of an educational opportunity, I also had to watch her bully, cheat, ignore, ridicule and isolate and defraud a profoundly deaf nineteen year olds woman. I assure that I have witnessed my share of despicable behavior in my life; I never had to witness a defenseless woman get her soul raped. Then watch as corrupt bribe searching scum turned their back so they could claim their state obligation to party with the NOT-SEES.
I will make every one in the state aware of your boorish, childish, and petulant behavior, that you unashamedly displayed in the courtroom on November 21, 2016.
I suggest you withdraw from the race. If it is a worthy challenge you seek, allow me to recommend that you apply for an opening at the local bowling alley, cleaning toilets, third shift. This opportunity seems much more in alignment with your temperament and capabilities.
I would be willing to judge as reference for you in this most appropriate challenge befitting a person such as yourself and your obvious people skills.
Copies of this letter will be going to Detective Larette, Justice Gableman, Attorney Burns, The Madison Times, The Milwaukee Journal
judge Dalled disregarded my brief, the state statutes, precedents, case law, Judge Crabb's rulings and any human decency when ruling that the disabled are NOT entitled to a lower postage rate when they filed any Request for Review, in an abuse and defrauding of several disabled students. Despite what §814.29 states. She was a complete BULLY to me and my Mother in the courtroom; sneering at me while blowing kisses to the abusive defendant and her state provided defense, the Attorney General. When she fixes a case; she brings her friends. She then altered the transcripts after removing my "reader", my 83 year old Mother from council table as I am almost legally blind and have severe cognitive damage. Her orders prove that she lied about removing my "Reader", my Mother. I will knock on every door in Wisconsin and tell them what a cheating, lying, LAW DISREGARDING and CASE FIXING bully she is. DO NOT VOTE FOR HER FOR SUPREME COURT JUSTICE, as I know that she denies the poor fair hearings. She is the most appealed judge in Wisconsin history with 108. She was removed from the criminal docket for bullying, then, she was, "hidden" in the civil court, and was voted the "HARSHEST" judge in Wisconsin. She is currently being investigated by the Wisconsin Judicial Commission. AGAIN! She sent her goons after me - THEY DON'T SCARE ME.ReplyDelete
I will never stop exposing her for the gigantic BULLYING FRAUD she is. She protects animal abusers and champions the defrauding of the disabled because the abusers give her cash. She ignores the handicapped, because they cannot fight back; She makes it very clear: the disabled have no place in her courtroom. Thousands of documents detailing the many frauds and severe abuse, "do not matter" to Dallet, as she disregards solid evidence of violations the law,. Ignored statutes, precedents, and case law, then she ruled on the case based on who is most fun to cheat, or where her friends are seated.
She belongs in a yogurt commercial NOT SCOTSOW