Because too many college freshman need remedial help in math and reading, Republicans have a government solution...yes, a BIG GOVERNMENT SOLUTION, "Education Savings Accounts," with more mandates and regulations that supposedly put parents in charge...again.
As a parent of two students in the Middleton Cross Plains school district, I've had my hands filled with keeping my guys up to date on current, late and future homework.
Between face-to-face meetings and email exchanges with teachers, endless arguments with the kids about excessive computer time, college and loan/grant shopping, and basic general family time to shoot the bull, why in gods name do parents need another time consuming complication like K-12 savings accounts?
Small Government My Ass: It's already enough to just save for college with a myriad of investment choices, but now parents are supposed to manage a K-12 Education Savings Account and find the time to shop for schools, textbooks and tutors? This is an open invitation for fly-by-night ripoff artists. Looks like another big monied special interest group is directing our pay-to-play Republican legislators to do their bidding once again for campaign funding.
PARENTS ARE ALREADY IN CHARGE: Seriously. Do Republican legislators even know anything about school district "parent portals" that allow parents to watch over their kids tests scores, current and late assignments, to-do lists, email contacts with teachers and staff? Never once was I ever down for help. In fact, just the opposite. That's because teachers are not only professional and concerned about our kids, they also have to answer to the taxpayers.
Enough already with putting the "parents in charge." And if there is a problem with reading and math, let's put some of that blame on those supposed "in-charge parents."
Will You Let Other People Spend Your Tax Money with No Accountability? So conservative voters are good with this? Another government program, more rules and regulations, taxpayer money, and no accountability? Parents can spend money based on the sales pitch from the shiniest school brochure? That's "fiscally conservative?"
Assembly Republicans are considering a program that would allow Wisconsin parents to pay for K-12 school expenses — including private school tuition, textbooks and tutoring — with a taxpayer-funded stream of money known in other states as Education Savings Accounts.
Ron Martin, president of the Wisconsin Education Association Council, said the programs amount to a “back-door scheme” to take money away from public school funding. “Education savings accounts literally take money out of our neighborhood public schools and hand it over to subsidize private tuition, with zero accountability.”
Republican Hypocrisy on Poverty: You'll notice that when it comes to getting life saving health care, government draws the line at 100% of the poverty level. But with for profit private education, and special interest cash on the line, the poverty line moves from just 100%, to 185%-300%. Money talks:
Rep. Dale Kooyenga, R-Brookfield, said a starting point might be to offer the programs to families whose income currently makes them qualify for school vouchers — which is 185 percent of the federal poverty level in the statewide voucher program and 300 percent of the federal poverty level in the Milwaukee and Racine programs.
New Idea? One newspaper called this a new idea, which is never the case for our monolithic Borg-like Republican Party. GOP states that have it:
Arizona, Florida, Mississippi, Nevada and Tennessee.ALEC sets the Pace: Coincidentally, state Republicans are bringing this up now:
The conservative group American Legislative Exchange Council, which helps lawmakers write model legislation, released model policy language on Education Savings Accounts this year.Wisconsin might find itself with the same problem as Nevada:
Nevada allows any parent — regardless of income or a child’s ability status — to use the accounts. But on Friday, the Nevada Supreme Court struck down the law that provides them, saying the program violated the state’s constitution by sending money reserved for public schools to parents who could use it to pay for private school tuition. Attorney Tamerlin Godley said, “The court said ‘You can’t do it. You have to fund your public schools sufficiently. After you’ve done that, then you can go back and look at competing state money to put some aside for ESAs.”
Mikalsen: "If your child isn't doing well, you don't care what the schools do, you're worried about your child. This is another way to get individual parents which I know Jeff (caller) doesn't like, because he thinks everybody should be at the control of government...um, and we should be in control of what they think and how they think it and when they think it. But that's passe...we're looking at the next phase of how do you empower parents."Yea, screw actual education curriculum and standards. Go Parent Power!!!
Another big problem:
The state’s public school districts cannot charge tuition, raising questions about whether public school districts could be part of the program and receive money from parents using the accounts.But I don't get the following argument; that it's okay to send taxpayer money to people so they can put it into a savings account.
Grants ... shall be set apart as a separate fund to be called “the school fund,” the interest of which and all other revenues derived from the school lands shall be exclusively applied to the following objects, to wit: (1) To the support and maintenance of common schools, in each school district...
...not people!!! Note; people should not have the choice to spend that money on a religious schools in Wisconsin. According to our Constitution:
; and no sectarian instruction shall be allowed therein;