Thursday, December 3, 2015

Republicans Blame gunless "Soft Targets" in those Gun Free Zones.

The title pretty much sums up what my conservative friend in Milwaukee said when he called me to say, I told you so about gun free zones. Yes, every unarmed citizen in the country is called a soft targets, and those in gun free zones are only asking for trouble. Ever get the idea that the NRA's ultimate objective is to coerce everyone into carrying a gun?

Two thirds of Americans are "soft targets," you know, walking gun free zones. They're too afraid to defend themselves like brave good freedom loving American would do.

Oh, and the terrorist attackers in San Bernardino were responsible legal gun owners...until they weren't. They're arguing now that the extensive background checks in California didn't stop anybody, so why have backgrounds checks at all.

Here's the scary reality gun crazy psychopathic conservative gun fondlers are finding difficult to accept; Americans are wising up and getting rid of guns. What else could explain a bill right here in our state to remove the age limit to carry a gun hunting?
Household gun ownership in America is on a steady, long-term decline. The NORC data shows that American household gun ownership hit its peak in 1977, when more than half of American households (53.7 percent) reported having any guns. By 2014, only 32.4 percent of American households had a gun in the home -- less than a third.
  The percentage of Americans who reported personally owning a gun dropped more than 26 percent from 1985 to 2014.

In 1985, 30.5 percent most gun owners tend to be white men who live outside cities. Drawing from data from 2010 to 2014, NORC found that 39 percent of white respondents said they lived in a household with a gun. During the same period, 18.1 percent of black respondents and 15.2 percent of Hispanic respondents said there was a gun in their household. 
Check out The Nations recent article about the conservative activist Supreme Court decision that brought down the nation:

Paul Ryan had an unusual reaction that had nothing to do with the San Bernardino mass shooting, to somehow finally deal with mental illness? What in gods name is he talking about? 


  1. I expect that number will go back up when more of the libtard progressive marxist whiny crybabies wise up and see the economy is collapsing thanks to ignorant uninformed democratic voters who voted themselves more and more goodies increasing the debt to unserviceable and unsustainable levels.

    Good job!

  2. Stay on topic. But since you brought it up, Social programs that protect Americans should be paid for by Americans, it's their government. We're not all living by the seat of our pants like you.

    Funny thing, the link you provided is the same linked story my conservative friend in Milwaukee emailed to me twice for some reason, when the terrorist attack in California took place.

    Robotic and Borg-like to say the least.

    You guys paying attention at all? Didn't think so.