Aw, conservative cry babies didn't get their way. Time for a tantrum.
This amazing story is unfolding in Arizona and on a few
right wing web sites, where some claim they can override the federal government and
the Constitution with voter approval.
Would I kid you?
To prove their "patriotism," Tea Party Republicans are getting out their dog eared pocket constitutions, tossed them into the trash bin, and have decided to ignore the rule of law and the founding document of our country. If this isn't a recipe for complete chaos, I don't know what is:
AZDailySun: Voters could get the right to overrule federal
laws and mandates under the terms of an initiative filed late Thursday. The
Arizona Constitution already says the federal Constitution "is the supreme
law of the land." This measure, if approved in November, it would add
language saying that federal document may not be violated by any government --
including the federal government.
More to the point, it would allow Arizonans "to reject
any federal action that they determine violates the United States
Constitution." That could occur through a vote of the state House and
Senate with consent of the governor. But that also could occur through a
popular vote on a ballot measure, effectively allowing voters to decide which
federal laws they feel infringe on Arizona's rights as a sovereign state.
Now you know what our shoot from the hip, radically unorganized, small government Republicans think constitutes freedom and liberty; lawless Boss Hog chaos. There's more:
Organizer Jack Biltis said there is nothing in the U.S.
Constitution which gives the federal government the power to enact a national
health care plan. Biltis acknowledged that the U.S. Supreme Court, faced with
exactly that question, ruled to the contrary. "I believe the Supreme Court
completely got it wrong," he said.
Biltis’ also included the argument put forward by liberal
talk host Thom Hartmann:
In fact, Biltis argued, the ability of the nation's high
court to interpret -- and invalidate -- federal laws itself is not part of the
U.S. Constitution but was claimed by the court in 1803.
Biltis (also) finds to be constitutionally unacceptable the
federal law signed during the Bush administration which phases out the
manufacture and sale of incandescent light bulbs to save energy.
Yes, he's one of those "pigtail light bulb" protesters. Does it sound like Biltis wants to go back to, let’s say, the Civil War?
Nor is Biltis troubled by the idea of individual states
interpreting federal law -- and nullifying those they believe are
unconstitutional. He said that is precisely what happened in pre-Civil War days
when some Northern states refused to honor the federal Fugitive Slave Act which
required escaped slaves to be returned to their owners.
But Bilitis’ measure isn’t the only one on the ballot:
A separate proposal crafted by Rep. Chester Crandell,
R-Heber, would have Arizona declare its "sovereign and exclusive authority
and jurisdiction over the air, water, public lands, minerals, wildlife and
other natural resources within its boundaries." Exempt would be tribal and
military reservations.
Here's conservative radio's nicotine numskull Vicki McKenna, and 10th Amendment Centers Michael Bolden, pushing nullification of the health care exchanges (audio):