Trump Cultist Culture of Crying Victimhood.

I've been told Trump cultist video clips aren't really representative of the many of the other Republican voters, that we can't draw any conclusions from a few Trump Trash interviews. I say they're wrong.

Trump enablers are a quivering jumble of insecure and immature low information voters still celebrating their lack of adult supervision. 

Trump Cult jihadists?: Defying reality, Trump claimed anti-fascists were the actual fascists, that by default, made American nationalist terrorist organizations the go to MAGA defenders:

MSNBC: Colin P. Clarke, a senior research fellow at the Soufan Center, a global security research group, advised, “The reason a kid like Kyle Rittenhouse would go grab a gun and join a local militia is the same reason why somebody would be lured to a jihadi group.”

So the Trump's Department of Homeland Security decided to mirror those same recruitment measures, defining Kyle Rittenhouse's actions as defensive and sympathetic. Not kidding, this really happened: 

And they're ready to die for Trump and their mask-less pandemic:

This short video of a take-our-freedom-back rally comically warns "better start acting like American men and women, or we're going to end up like Chinese men and women."? 

Or "Get our nation back, get our freedom back, and GET OUR STUFF BACK."?

It's starts out small, like the supposed "innocent" use of doxing someone (posting the address and phone #), like those liberal enemies of the authoritarian movement, using fear and death threats as a God given free speech right. And every WI Republican Supreme Court Justice sealed that toxic terror into law:

72 yr old Associate Professor John McAdams’ used his personal blog to mock a student teacher, intentionally exposing her name and contact information to a hostile audience that sent her vile and threatening messages."

In a 4-2 ruling, the Court ruled that Marquette University political science professor was improperly suspended … (WILL's) Esenberg said claims that McAdams had endangered the graduate instructor were overblown. "If criticizing somebody amounts to 'painting a target' on their back … then none of us are free to say anything."

Justice Rebecca Bradley stressed...

"Academic freedom means nothing if faculty is forced to self-censor in fear of offending the unforeseen and ever-evolving sensitivities of adversaries demanding retribution." 

Today, doxing "freedom" has gone where we thought it would go politically: 

NewYorker: Michigan state Rep. Cynthia Johnson, who is African-American, posted to Facebook a number of hate messages that were left on her phone. “Your name and phone number is out there now,” an unidentified woman says in one of the messages. “You’re getting doxed bitch. You’re done. You’re so f***ing done. You should be swinging from a f***ing rope, you Democrat.”

The "Trump Won" bat-sh*t Crazy Cult: Sure President elect Joe Biden handily won the election, but that wasn't enough for radicalized Trump-trash cultists. Anyone willing to criticize Trump is a dangerous disgruntled enemy of America. Hillary said exactly that: 

Rep. Tom Tiffany Okay with Trump Changing Result of Election: Yet in Scott Walker's recall, the bad Dems were trying to change the results of an election:

Tiffany: "It's not our first time dealing with Democrats who want to change the result of an election. Long before the impeachment, we had recall elections held to cancel our votes for Gov. Scott Walker. When Wisconsin voters saw it was nothing more than a sham … they supported us on Election Day."

Trump's Stop-the-Steal Victimhood! Trump easily convinced cultists that Biden will become our illegitimate president. Below, is another compilation of cultist interviews that sound so much like the conversations we all have had with friend and relatives. This is representative of Trump's cult of personality. I've also noticed the word "socialist" being brought up a lot. Next time, ask them to point out anything around them or in their community that isn't government socialism. They might be surprised. 

Justice Hagedorn on Invalidating entire Presidential Election: "The relief being sought by the petitioners is the most dramatic invocation of judicial power I have ever seen."

Conservative Justice Brian Hagedorn is still right of center, voting most of the time with the majority of conservative Justices. But there's comfort in knowing that he isn't a predictable yes man to the GOP agenda pushed by the other Justices.

Yes, an actual swing vote on one of the most conservatively corrupt State Supreme Court's in the country. 

In the second Court decision rejecting Trump's request to throw out Dane and Milwaukee County voter ballots, Justice Hagedorn offered up the most memorable commentary to date. Nailed it:

"The relief being sought by the petitioners is the most dramatic invocation of judicial power I have ever seen," Hagedorn wrote. Hagedorn expressed alarm at the group's request to throw out nearly 3.3 million votes, calling it a "real stunner."

"We are invited to invalidate the entire presidential election in Wisconsin by declaring it ‘null’ — yes, the whole thing," wrote Hagedorn, who served as chief counsel to Republican Scott Walker when he was governor.

"This is a dangerous path we are being asked to tread. The loss of public trust in our constitutional order resulting from the exercise of this kind of judicial power would be incalculable."

  

Why the courts and not the Legislature? In another decision, the current GOP "legal" scam was revealed once again, where elected Republicans are using the Wisconsin Institute for Law and Liberty (WILL) to get the courts to legislate from the bench many unpopular decisions they know are toxic. Although this case isn't a WILL case, the scheme is the same;

On Friday, in a case brought by Trump in federal court, U.S. District Judge Brett Ludwig told an attorney for the president he was asking for "pretty remarkable declaratory relief" by asking to have the fate of Wisconsin's 10 electoral votes decided by the Legislature instead of voters.

He questioned whether the case should even be before him, noting Trump is arguing the Legislature has the power under the U.S. Constitution to decide who to send to the Electoral College.

"If that's the case, why are we doing anything in this court and if that's the appropriate arena for a remedy, why isn't the plaintiff going to the Legislature?" asked Ludwig, a Trump appointee who was confirmed by the U.S. Senate in September. "I get the argument but I have a very, very hard time seeing how this is justiciable in the federal court," Ludwig said. 

He added that Trump's lawsuit was "really bizarre" because it asks to "remand" the case to the Legislature, noting that remanding a case typically means returning it to a lower court for reconsideration. "I think the term 'remand' might be inartful," Bock responded.