Pages

Wednesday, September 14, 2022

Barnes' soft criticism of Johnson's incredibly careless record!

Mandela Barnes isn't injecting any urgency into his simple message, Ron Johnson is lying about him. Hey, that casual look of a regular guy is not impressing anyone. Barnes just lost seven percentage points, HUGE...

WPR: Of likely voters, 49 percent said they will support Johnson and 48 percent said they'd support Barnes. That's a shift from Marquette's Aug. 17 poll, which showed Barnes ahead by seven percentage points among voters likely or certain to vote in November.

It's hard to imagine anyone not being able to capitalize on Johnson endlessly brutal policy suggestions.  Johnson spews panic and confusion in every breath, while Barnes just smiles, oozing positivity. Who's consulting this campaign? Just type Ron Johnson's name into the upper left corner search bar of this blog if you want to have your research laid out in front of your very eyes. It's a miracle. "Wacky stuff" just doesn't cut it... 

More:Mandela Barnes proclaims Ron Johnson says 'wacky stuff' while the U.S. senator accuses his challenger of having a short résumé

Not mentioned ever...

Social Security is a pay-as-you-go system, self-funded safety net program. It has nothing to do with discretionary spending. Johnson's real intention could be to invest SS in Wall Street, raise age limits, etc...and send it to the Senate, what Mitch McConnell calls the "place where bills go to die." Let that sink in. 
AARP: The facts: The two trust funds that pay out Social Security benefits — one for retirees and their survivors, the other for people with disabilities — have never been part of the federal government's general fund. Social Security is a separate, self-funded program. The federal government does, however, borrow from Social Security.

Johnson is constantly handing him campaign gold everyday:

Heck, Barnes even has Biden directly referring to Johnson's not so innocent plans to save SS:

Is Barnes Waiting for something? Just today, the headline supposes Johnson does "not" have a position on a federal abortion ban...


...yet in the same article we're shown how Johnson is NOT unclear. The media again muddies what is a clear history of Johnson's support of a national ban. Hell, he's co-sponsored bills for god's sake:
Johnson has supported national abortion bans before, co-sponsoring six, 20 week abortion bans between 2013 and 2021. In late August, Johnson said states should decide the issue but added that Congress could eventually set the limit, according to the Washington County Daily News.

The measures Johnson supported all preceded the U.S. Supreme Court decision that “returned the issue to the states,” Henning said.

No comments:

Post a Comment