Conservatives and Tea Party Americans Politicization of the Courts an Affirmation of their Convictions.

Why don’t conservative voters rebel against one party rule once their party is in complete control?

Why don’t small government Republicans protest state laws mandating people buy car insurance?

Why don’t constitutional conservatives oppose changes to the constitution?

Why would tea party believers in the “people’s government” want to take away the people’s ability to make their own future choices by enshrining laws in state constitutions?

Why didn’t the tea party movement protest enshrining “corporate personhood” in our constitution?

Why aren’t Republicans and tea partiers outraged over a Supreme Court Justices wife becoming an influence peddling lobbyist for “free enterprise and other core conservative issues?”

NY Times: The wife of Justice Clarence Thomas … is rebranding herself as a lobbyist and self-appointed “ambassador to the Tea Party movement.” She promised to use her “experience and connections” to help clients raise money and increase their political impact ... she was looking forward to a new role involving “lobbying on Capitol Hill.” 

Why aren’t conservatives worried about the politicization of the judicial branch of government when Justices speak at political gatherings?

Common Cause, a liberal group that has been critical of potential conflicts at the Supreme Court caused by Ms. Thomas’s work, said her new position, combined with Justice Antonin Scalia’s recent address before a closed-door seminar of the Tea Party Caucus, provided further evidence of “the politicization of the court. The level of bias we’re seeing is really troubling.”

Why are conservatives troubled by liberal bias, but not troubled by right wing conservative bias?

Why? Because conservative political influence is an affirmation of their convictions. Liberalism questions their authority and leadership. 

Or put another way, “their sh*t don’t stink.”