The NY Times recently
wrote this:
The strategists see openings to exploit after a string of Tea Party successes split Republicans in a number of states, culminating last week with developments that scrambled Senate races in Delaware and Alaska. “We need to get out the message that it’s now really dangerous to re-empower the Republican Party,” said one Democratic strategist.
Is dangerous too strong a word? Not in this case, and here’s why.
Instead of providing solutions, crazy tea party constitutionalists and now "serious" political candidates, are going to give us lectures on their version of the Constitution. Forget the recessionary suffering and joblessness, sit down and listen. I wish I were kidding.
I promise that if these extremists do find their way into Washington, they will try to etch in stone their jackass channelings of what the founding fathers really meant and will do nothing to provide for the general welfare. After all, “welfare” is a dangerously socialist word, a word slipped into the Constitution in the middle of the night, and passed before anyone had a chance to read it.
A question from Fox’s Chris Wallace inadvertently revealed the tea party plan of governance, when he asked Senate candidate Joe Miller how he would solve poverty and help the unemployed during the recession. It started with “the lecture.”
Joe Miller: "The question is, what is the role of government?”
No comments:
Post a Comment