tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7183447461205976739.post2918422939584862242..comments2024-02-26T17:13:18.702-06:00Comments on DemoCurmudgeon: Right-to-Work Questions Stump Republicans, prove they're full of S**t!Democurmudgeonhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/16336177394503335112noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7183447461205976739.post-31633019750834207902015-02-27T22:05:52.477-06:002015-02-27T22:05:52.477-06:00No, the union and employer already have an agreeme...No, the union and employer already have an agreement. The job seeker is responsible for knowing if the business has a union. If it does, he can seek employment elsewhere. It's not what you described, separate from the employer, unless you don't get this at all.Democurmudgeonhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/16336177394503335112noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7183447461205976739.post-56679891351002920032015-02-27T12:52:11.916-06:002015-02-27T12:52:11.916-06:00The union should not have a say in who the busines...The union should not have a say in who the business owner hires or fires. That type of decision is purely between the individual and the business owner. If the union is such a great deal and provides such great benefits then it will not matter if a state is right to work because people would still be happy to join the union.<br /><br />Now I do think unions should be released from representing any employees that choose not to participate in the union and that any negotiated benefits should not automatically apply to non union workers. Let people make the decisions for themselves on what is right for them.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com